Sunday, October 23, 2005

My take on Intelligent Design

With "Intelligent Design" becoming more and more the zeitgeist, I am particularly upset on how much it relies on clouded thinking. Promotors of ID love to pick on evolution as being just a theory. OK, I'll accept it is just a theory just as I accept that neutrons and protons are theoretical. The evidence is there for both evolution and atomic theories. There is not an iota of evidence for some spiritual being designing the nature of things which the ID people are trying to push. Spirituality is a matter of belief. You either believe it or you don't. Evidence is not required for intellectual laziness.

If you believe in "Intelligent Design" go ahead and teach it as part of a philosophy or religion course, but don't try to palm it off as science.

I challenge John H. Calvert, Esq. to respond.

Damn you ID guys to hell!


Blogger Nigel said...

Right on. Thanks for the Athiest link in the sidebar. Cool org. You have a typo with "Evidemce" in the last line of your first paragraph.

10:13 PM  
Blogger cay said...

Methinks your son has a typo as well (ha ha). I believe, well, actually I know it is "Atheist."

7:19 PM  
Anonymous nitsuga00917 said...

Evolution theory is not a product of science. In fact, it is only a default explanation for the observed fenomena. It is against the basic Laws of thermodynamics. Entropy doesn´t makes things easier for Darwinist.

9:28 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Evolution is not against the basic laws of thermodynamics because the earth is not a closed system. Instead it receives energy from the sun, which allows life to flourish.

12:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to say thanks to the man who made the cartoon of muhammed becouse the cartoon give good description about mohammed and hisidea to make people scare but i believe that he willnot succes because stoped by peole who like peace espesially westpeople so keep on to make people free.

7:47 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home